Saturday, May 16, 2020

Richard Loving, A White Man And Mildred Jeter - 913 Words

ï‚› In 1958, in the District of Columbia, Richard Loving, a white man and Mildred Jeter, a black woman was married. Shortly after the marriage the Loving’s returned to Virginia. Upon returning to Virginia the couple was charged with violating Virginia’s Anti-miscegenation Statue. That bans inter-racial marriages. The Loving’s were found guilty and sentenced to a year in jail but the judge offered to suspend their sentence if the Loving’s were to leave Virginia and not return for 25 years. ï‚› Racial integrity Act of 1924 prohibited interracial marriage and was passed by the General Assembly to protect â€Å"Whiteness† from negative effects of race-mixing. ï‚› What is the Question: ï‚› Did Virginia s anti-miscegenation law violate the Equal†¦show more content†¦In 1959 they were expelled from the state of Virginia for violating the state law that forbids interracial marriage. ï‚› November 6, 1963 - Bernard S. Cohen, representing Richard and Mildred Loving, files a motion in the Caroline County Circuit Court to vacate their 1959 conviction for violating the state law that forbids interracial marriage. He also asks that the two one-year suspended sentences be set aside. ï‚› January 22, 1965 - Leon M. Bazile, a judge for the circuit court of Caroline County, refuses a motion on behalf of Richard and Mildred Loving to vacate their 1959 conviction for violating the state law that forbids interracial marriage. ï‚› March 7, 1966 - In Loving v. Virginia, the Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals upholds the state s antimiscegenation laws. The Court also sets aside the original conviction of Richard and Mildred Loving, finding that a sentence requiring the defendants to leave the state is unreasonable.† ï‚› April 10, 1967 - The U.S. Supreme Court hears oral arguments in the case of Loving v. Virginia. Richard and Mildred Loving, of Caroline County, are appealing their 1959 conviction for violating Virginia s laws prohibiting interracial marriage. ï‚› June 12, 1967 - In Loving v. Virginia, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously rules that Virginia s antimiscegenation statutes violate the Constitution s Fourteenth Amendment. The decisionShow MoreRelatedThe Life Of Mildred Delores Jeter And Musiel Byrd Jeter1239 Words   |  5 PagesMildred Delores Jeter was born in Central Point, Virginia on June 22, 1939. Mildred’s parents were Theoliver Jeter and Musiel Byrd Jeter. Mildred Loving was of African American, European and Native American origin, specifically from the Cherokee and Rappahannock tribes. Mildred s family had lived in the area around Central Point, Virginia for a long time, where blacks and whites mixed freely with little racial conflict even at the peak of the Jim Crow era. Mildred was a shy woman who became a reluctantRead MoreLoving vs. Virgina783 Words   |  4 PagesLOVING v. VIRGINIA Can you imagine not being able to share your life with the person you love because of the color of your skin? Well, this was the case for those who resided in Virginia decades ago. Interracial marriages were not allowed in Virginia and sixteen other states due to the adoption of the Racial Integrity Act of 1924. The sole purpose of this act was to completely prohibit a white person marrying other than another white person. Marriage licenses were not issued until theRead MoreLoving V. Virginia, Introduction, Facts, Legal Background1567 Words   |  7 PagesLoving v. Virginia Interracial marriage: Respecting the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. I. INTRODUCTION This case note will examine the 1967 landmark Supreme Court case of Loving v. Virginia. The Loving v. Virginia case touched on constitutional principles including equality, federalism, and liberty. Just over 30 years ago, it was a crime for interracial couples in Virginia to marry, or to live as husband and wife. Prior to the 1967 case of Loving v. VirginiaRead MoreThe Supreme Court Case Loving V. Virginia1609 Words   |  7 PagesOn June 2, 1958 Mildred Jeter and Richard Loving went to Washington D.C. to get married and they went back to Virginia a few days later. But because Mildred was of African-American and Native American decent, and Richard was white they were arrested for violating the state law that prohibits interracial marriage. At the time, Virginia was one of 17 states, including Texas and Alabama, that had laws prohibiting interracial marriage (Wolfe). The Supreme Court Case Loving v. Virginia is an importantRead MoreEssay on Loving v. Virginia (388 U.S. 1)2059 Word s   |  9 Pagesafter midnight, Richard Loving a white man and Mildred Loving an African American woman were awakened to the presence of three officers in their bedroom. One of the three officers demanded from Richard to identify the woman next to him. Mildred, full of fear, told the officers that she was his wife, while Richard pointed to the marriage license on the wall. The couple was then charged and later found guilty in violation of the states anti-miscegenation statute. Mr. and Mrs. Loving were residentsRead MoreAmerica s Miscegenation Anxiety And The State Of Virginia1383 Words   |  6 Pagescitizenship, or to deny any person â€Å"the equal protection of the laws.† After the Supreme Court ultimately neutralized this amendment through its decision in Plessy v. Ferguson, the southern states, individually, built legal barriers between blacks and whites in practically every aspect of life. America’s miscegenation anxiety, very clearly documented in legislature, can also be found in social thought and theory. Indeed, Thomas Jefferson’s Notes On The State of Virginia must be thought of as one ofRead MoreHow The Virginia State Statue Of Anti Miscegenation And The Fourteenth Amendment Essay2353 Words   |  10 Pagesbiracial marriages and segregation laws that were discriminatory in history. I read the short story about the Loving family and their pursuit to the Supreme Court in 1967, I thought of my own family history and realized that my paternal grandparents would’ve been prosecuted had they lived in Virginia or any other state that prohibited bi-racial marriages in the 1900s. My grandfather was an Irish man and my grandmother was a Native American Crow Creek Dakotah/HoChunk woman, luckily they weren’t victimsRead MoreShould Same Sex Marriage Be Legal?2556 Words   |  11 PagesAlia Thompson Wanosky APUSH, Block F June 10, 2015 US History: Definition of a â€Å"Real Marriage† Can the US government define a marriage in 2015? In the United States, marriage is defined as â€Å"a formal union between a man and woman† [New York Times]. It is estimated that 229 million people currently are legally married in United States [Freedom to Marry]. But at the same time only thirty-six states including the District of Columbia is where same sex marriage is legal [Freedom to Marry]. RecentRead MoreThe Supreme Court and Civil Rights Essay991 Words   |  4 PagesCourt took on more responsibility and started making additional decisions, which in time helped minorities gain their civil rights. It took a couple of years, as a matter of fact till the 1900’s for the Supreme Court to get out of the â€Å"ideology of white supremacy and the practice of racism,† (Smith). Though the decisions of the Supreme Court were not all that appreciated in the beginning, following the 20th century the court really facilitated in the advancements of civil rights. The Supreme CourtRead MoreThe Changes in Society’s Views on Interracial Dating over Time1466 Words   |  6 Pagesinterracial relationships became more relevant. It sparked much controversy after a couple from Virginia was arrested for participating in an interracial relationship. The case, Loving versus Virginia, was taken to the Supreme Court, who found it to be unconstitutional. The couple, Richard Loving, a white man, and his wife, Mildred, a black woman, were married in Washington D.C. Almost immediately after, they went back to their home state of Virginia. However, their happiness was short lived after they

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.